DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS

Design of Experiments


CASE STUDY

Link: DOE Case Study


where,

Factor A: Diameter of bowl (cm)

Factor B: Microwaving time (mins)

Factor C: Power (%)


Factors 

Low

High

A (cm)

10

15

B (mins)

4

6

C (%)

75

100


Admin no.: 2135474

Run Order

A

B

C

Bullets (g)

1

+

-

-

3.74

2

-

+

-

2.74

3

-

-

+

0.74

4

+

+

-

1.74

5

+

-

+

0.95

6

+

+

+

0.32

7

-

+

+

0.74

8

-

-

-

3.12



a. Full Factorial Data Analysis (Case Study)

For Full Factorial data analysis, two factors are said to interact with each other if the effect of one factor on the response variable is different at different levels of the other factor.

Taking the interaction effect of A x B as an example, the effect of diameter of bowls, at low microwaving time, 0.415 (increase), is different from the effect of diameter of bowls at high microwaving time, -0.71 (decrease).



Effect of each factors



When diameter of bowl increases from 10 cm to 15 cm, the mass of bullets formed decreases from 1.84 g to 0.6875 g.

When microwaving time increases from 4 mins to 6 mins, the mass of bullets formed decreases from 2.14 g to 1.385 g.

When power increases from 75% to 100%, the mass of bullets formed decreases from 2.84 g to 0.6875 g.





From the interaction effect of A x B, the gradient of both lines are different. At low B, gradient is positive. At high B, gradient is negative. Hence there is significant interaction between factors A & B.



From the interaction effect of A x C, the gradient of both lines are different by a little margin. Hence, there is small interaction between factors A & C.



From the interaction effect of  Bx C, the gradients of both lines are negative and are of different values. Hence, there is significant interaction between factors B & C.



Conclusion:

From the Full Factorial data analysis, Factor B is the most significant followed by A and C. Since B produces more significant interaction with the other two factors, hence, it is the most significant factor.


b. Fractional Factorial data analysis (Case Study)

For Fractional Factorial data analysis, I selected runs 2, 3, 4 and 5 as all the factors, both high and low, occur the same number of times and is said to be orthogonal.




Effect of each factors


When diameter of bowl increases from 10 cm to 15 cm, the mass of bullets formed decreases from 0.87 g to 0.6725 g.

When microwaving time increases from 4 mins to 6 mins, the mass of bullets formed increases from 0.42 g to 1.12 g.

When power increases from 75% to 100%, the mass of bullets formed decreases from 1.12 g to 0.4225 g.




Conclusion:

From the Fractional Factorial data analysis, factor C is the most significant factor because it has the largest difference in values from the lowest to highest followed by factor B and factor A which is the least significant factor.



PRACTICAL

Link: Practical Excel Sheet

In this practical, my team and I were tasked to investigate the launch of projectile using a catapult. The three factors identified which affects the distance the projectile travelled are:

1. Arm length (cm)

2. Projectile weight (g)

3. Stop angle (°)

64 runs were carried out during the practical and the measured variable is the distance the projectile travelled. The independent variables are as follows:

Factor A: Arm length (cm)

Factor B: Projectile weight (g)

Factor C: Stop Angle (°)


Factors 

Low

High

A (cm)

22.5

28

B (g)

0.87

2.01

C (°)

60

90


a. Full Factorial data analysis (Practical)




From the interaction effect of A x B, the gradient of both lines are negative and are of different values. Hence there is significant interaction between factors A & B.




From the interaction effect of A x C, the gradient of both lines are different. At low C, gradient is negative. At high C, gradient is positive. Hence there is significant interaction between factors A & C.




From the interaction effect of B x C, the gradient of both lines are different. At low C, gradient is negative. At high C, gradient is positive. Hence there is significant interaction between factors A & B. However, as both lines are almost parallel, the interaction is small.




b. Fractional Factorial data analysis (Practical)

For Fractional Factorial data analysis, the team selected runs 1, 2, 3 and 4 as all the factors, both high and low, occur the same number of times and is said to be orthogonal.





Effect of each factors


When arm length increases from 22.5 cm to 28 cm, the projectile distance decreases from 171.7 cm to 137.4 cm.

When projectile weight increases from 0.87 g to 2.01 g, the projectile distance increases from 134.4 cm to 174.7 cm.

When stop angle increases from 60° to 90°, the projectile distance decreases from 208.3 cm to 100.85 cm.



Conclusion:

From the Fractional Factorial data analysis, factor C is the most significant factor because it has the largest difference in values from the lowest to highest followed by factor B and factor A which is the least significant factor.


Setup

This was the group's setup and we positioned the catapult behind the masking tape and that was the starting point of our measurement.




This was our failed attempt because the ball could not reach the sand so we had to shift the sand box forward.



This was one of our successful attempts.



Reflection

During tutorial, I was introduced to design of experiments. The pre-practical task was a good practice for me to perform full factorial and fractional factorial data analysis on my own. I got to apply the concepts learned during tutorial to my practical and case study. During the practical, I found the challenge fun because we got to attempt to manipulate the independent variables from our experimental results to attain the goal distance. Through the manipulation of variables, my team and I succeeded to earn second place in the class challenge.